NEWS Marin Voice: Richmond Bridge bike lane part of mission to remove cycling obstacles

While we would much rather share the excitement we have heard and witnessed since the pathway opened, it has become impossible to ignore questions posed in the Independent Journal about the pathway’s utility and cost, especially with so much key information missing from the conversation.


The Richmond-San Rafael Bridge pathway recently opened to incredible fanfare, as thousands of people of all ages and abilities — from children, to the elderly, to the mobility-impaired — came out to cross the bridge by foot and bike for the first time in its 69-year history.

Many were pleasantly surprised to find it to be a relatively quick, easy ride that takes around 20 minutes, or somewhere between 45-60 if traveling between downtown San Rafael and downtown Richmond. And the views are absolutely stunning.

While we would much rather share the excitement we have heard and witnessed since the pathway opened, it has become impossible to ignore questions posed in the Independent Journal about the pathway’s utility and cost, especially with so much key information missing from the conversation.

If the bridge were built today, we are confident it would offer dedicated space for people on foot and bike, in cars and on transit. Building it without accommodations for all types of travel was incredibly shortsighted and has contributed to the congestion people experience today.

Unfortunately, the project has been framed as a zero-sum game between bicycle/pedestrian and vehicle access. So, to start with the most pressing question: why should the upper (westbound) deck shoulder provide access for people on foot and bike, rather than those driving? And at what cost?

Readers won’t be surprised to hear us say that it’s another step toward improving health and air quality, completing the 500-mile Bay Trail, and providing an alternative to driving.

But for those who remain unconvinced, what we have to say next may surprise you: Opening the third lane to cars almost certainly won’t fix traffic.

In 2007, Caltrans looked at the impacts of opening a third lane to vehicles on both decks. They found that adding a third lane to the lower (eastbound) deck during the evening commute would increase throughput — or the number of vehicles that can cross the bridge in an hour — by 22%.

But on the upper deck, it would be a very different story: throughput would be improved by less than 2% during the morning commute. That’s because the primary source of westbound congestion is the toll plaza.

Perhaps most importantly, even if a third lane were added to the bridge, a bottleneck would ultimately result on the Marin side, where Highway 580 narrows to two lanes. To widen 580 to three lanes would be a massive undertaking — and then comes the question about what would happen when traffic spills onto Highway 101.

All of these considerations — as well as a question around whether the bridge can actually handle the weight of a third vehicle lane — are currently under review, with studies to be published sometime in 2020. Until then, arguments to remove or limit the pathway in order to relieve congestion are purely speculative.

To the drivers fed up with traffic, our goal is not to make your lives worse — quite the contrary, actually. We know that not everyone can or will ride a bicycle, and that bicycles alone are not the solution to traffic, or even our climate crisis. But our mission is to remove the barriers for those who are interested and willing to ride. If we’re successful, everyone will benefit, drivers included.

Lastly, this debate should not end with the “third lane.” Take a moment to consider why congestion has increased so dramatically over the bridge in recent years: a growing number of people who work in the North Bay cannot afford to live here, and don’t have access to reliable, convenient regional transit.

– Bjorn Griepenburg is policy and planning director for the Marin County Bicycle Coalition

Article printed in the Marin Independent Journal – Original editorial >>

MEMBERS MAKE IT HAPPEN

The Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Pathway opening showed us that the bicycling community is incredibly strong when we come together as one. No matter who you are, why you ride, or how you ride, we need you as we celebrate the bicycle and all of the good it does for us, our communities, and the planet.

Similar Articles

Building Safe Routes to the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge

One down, two to go! Since the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge multi-use pathway opened in November 2019, we’ve been doubling down for safer, more intuitive connections to and from the bridge. Find out what we’re working on following the recent completion of a protected bikeway linking Francisco Blvd. E with Andersen Drive.